Supreme Court wipes away ruling that said Trump violated Constitution by blocking Twitter followers :





























The Supreme Court on Monday wiped away a lower court opinion holding that then-President Donald Trump violated the First Amendment when he blocked followers from his Twitter account.

The high court dismissed the case because Trump is not in office so there is no longer a live case or controversy.
Trump established his Twitter account in 2009, and in May and June of 2017, while serving as President, he blocked seven individuals who had expressed displeasure with him.




























Lawyers from the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University sued on behalf of the individuals, arguing Trump’s action violated their First Amendment rights.
In court papers, they said the President’s account, @realDonaldTrump, “functions as an official source of news and information about the government, and as a forum for speech by, to, and about the President.”

 

 

UAE launches Dh30 billion programme to stimulate vital sectors :

Pandikar: Cabotage revival can lead to Sabah and Sarawak secession :

Liberal MP Andrew Laming created dozens of Facebook pages to promote LNP and attack opponents :

Malaysia confident of attracting more foreign investment this year, says finance minister :

Government plans to invite people below the age of 45 to book COVID-19 vaccination slots from June :

More data needed to assess if changes to border measures can be made for vaccinated travellers: Janil Puthucheary :

Sir Keir Starmer apologises for visit to church criticised for LGBT stance :

Josh Hawley, a critic of Biden picks’ support for wars in Middle East, previously blogged in support of Iraq War :

VP Harris is the latest White House official to appear with California Gov. Newsom amid recall effort :

Arkansas’ Republican governor vetoes anti-trans health care bill :

Manchin warns Biden’s infrastructure bill is in trouble over corporate tax hikes :

Parliamentarian gives Democrats potential new tool for reconciliation in early ruling :

Justice Clarence Thomas suggests US should regulate Facebook, Google and Twitter :

Supreme Court wipes away ruling that said Trump violated Constitution by blocking Twitter followers :

Blinken says US won’t trade Covid shots for political favors :


 

 





























A district court said the then-President’s action of blocking followers violated the individuals’ First Amendment rights because it excluded them from a public forum based on their viewpoints — a decision an appeals court later affirmed.

Then-Solicitor General Jeff Wall asked the Supreme Court to take up the case, arguing that Trump’s account is personal, even if it is sometimes run by his assistant Dan Scavino.




























“By ignoring the critical distinction between the President’s (sometimes) official statements on Twitter and his always personal decision to block respondents from his own account,” Wall argued, the lower court opinion “blurs the line between state action and private conduct — notwithstanding this Court’s repeated and recent exhortations to heed that line carefully in applying the First Amendment.”
But after the election and after Twitter banned Trump from the platform for violating its policies related to the US Capitol insurrection, Wall asked the Court to dismiss the case and wipe away the lower court opinion.











































































































































Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *